Moto G64 vs Samsung Galaxy F16 5G

x Moto G64 ₹14,900 Amazon	x Samsung Galaxy F16 5G ₹12,699 Amazon
Overview Price Photos Specs Reviews Competitors Pros & Cons User Ratings Benchmarks News Related Reviews

Add More Products

4.3 ★

Moto G64

₹14,900

Amazon

4.2 ★

Samsung Galaxy F16 5G

₹12,699

Amazon

Overview Show Only Differences

Expert Score
8.2/10By Expert	--
Processor
MediaTek Dimensity 7025 Octa core	MediaTek Dimensity 6300 Octa core
RAM & Storage
8 GB RAM 128 GB Storage	4 GB RAM 128 GB Storage
Camera
50+8 MP Rear 16 MP Front	50+5+2 MP Rear 13 MP Front
Display
6.5″ (16.51 cm) 120Hz IPS LCD	6.7″ (17.02 cm) 90Hz Super AMOLED
Battery
6000 mAh \| 33W Fast Charging	5000 mAh \| 25W Fast Charging
Price
₹ 14,900 Amazon	₹ 12,699 Amazon

Photos and Videos

PHOTOS

VIDEO

WEB STORY

360 VIEW

PHOTOS

Pros & Cons

PROS

Excellent Battery LifeRear Camera in DaylightReliable Daily PerformanceQuick Fingerprint scannerGood DesignAmple Storage OptionAffordable Price

We are yet to review this device

CONS

Display Struggles in bright sunlightSlow ChargerCamera Speed in Night Mode

We are yet to review this device

Reviews

8.2/10 by Shruti Dhapola | 09 May 2024

The Moto G64 aims to offer an affordable device without cutting too many corners. And it succeeds in that aspect to a large extent. If you go for the higher-end variant, you get 256GB storage and 12GB RAM for under Rs 16,000, which is impressive. What stands out is the design, the general performance, the camera, and the large battery size. The user interface is also simple. But then Motorola is restricting Android updates to just one more version. Is this the best display one can get on a phone? No, nor is it a device centred around gaming. But then, given the price, it ticks some of the more important boxes quite nicely. If one goes by pricing, its biggest rival would be the Realme P1, which has more to offer on the gaming front. Get the Moto G64 if you want a phone that does the basics well and your budget is limited to Rs 14,000-Rs 16,000.

Read Full Review

We are yet to review this device

Users Ratings

4.3/5 Based on 59K Ratings

59% (34.6K)

25% (14.7K)

7% (4,190)

3% (1,665)

7% (3,853)

4.2/5 Based on 2,292 Ratings

57% (1,310)

22% (511)

9% (201)

4% (87)

8% (183)

Performance

8	--
Chipset
MediaTek Dimensity 7025	MediaTek Dimensity 6300
No Of Cores
8 (Octa Core)	8 (Octa Core)
CPU
2.5GHz, Dual core, Cortex A78 2GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55	2.4GHz, Dual core, Cortex A76 2GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55
Architecture
64-bit	64-bit
Fabrication
6 nm	6 nm
RAM
8 GB	4 GB
RAM Type
LPDDR4X	NA
Graphics (GPU)
IMG BXM-8-256	Mali-G57 MC2

Add More Products

Moto G64 & Samsung Galaxy F16 5G Competitors

realme P1

₹ 13,999

Available

Compare

iQOO Z10x

₹ 13,498

Available

Compare

Samsung Galaxy A16 5G

₹ 17,449

Available

Compare

Samsung Galaxy F15

₹ 11,890

Available

Compare

Moto G54

₹ 14,999

Out of Stock

Compare

Motorola Edge 50 Fusion

₹ 18,999

Available

Compare

Moto G45 5G

₹ 10,568

Available

Compare

POCO M7 Pro

₹ 12,849

Available

Compare

Samsung Galaxy M35 5G

₹ 13,999

Available

Compare

Samsung Galaxy M06 5G

₹ 9,499

Available

Compare

realme P3

₹ 15,999

Available

Compare

Samsung Galaxy F06 5G

₹ 8,949

Available

Compare

OPPO K13x

₹ 11,999

Available

Compare

vivo T4X

₹ 13,999

Available

Compare

Samsung Galaxy M16 5G

₹ 11,499

Available

Compare

View All

Related News

Best Battery Life Phones Under Rs. 15,000 in India: Vivo T4X 5G, Realme P3x, iQOO Z9x, And More

Abhiman Biswas - 25 Mar, 2025

This is the Cheapest OIS-Enabled Moto Phone in India

Chinmay Dhumal - 28 Nov, 2024

POCO M6 Plus vs Moto G64: Price, Specifications, and Features Compared

Shimul Sood - 05 Aug, 2024

Redmi 13 5G vs Moto G64 5G? Choosing the Perfect Budget 5G Phone

Keval Vachharajani - 13 Jul, 2024

Moto G64 Review: Basics Done Well at Affordable Price

Shruti Dhapola - 09 May, 2024

Related Reviews

Realme P3 5G Review: Affordable Beast in a Silver Armour

Shubh Bhushan - 26 Mar, 2025

Vivo T4X Review: A Strong Contender Under ?15,000, but There’s a Catch

Shubh Bhushan - 05 Mar, 2025

Poco M7 Pro Review: The Biggest Upgrade Ever?

Shimul Sood - 02 Jan, 2025

Samsung Galaxy A16 Review: A Smart Choice for Budget Seekers?

Shimul Sood - 28 Nov, 2024

Samsung Galaxy M35 Review: A Safe Budget Choice?

Shimul Sood - 31 Aug, 2024

Motorola Edge 50 Fusion Review: A Beautiful, Balanced Mid-Range Contender

Keval Vachharajani - 30 May, 2024

Realme P1 5G Review: Stellar Performance at a Budget-Friendly Price

Shimul Sood - 29 Apr, 2024

View All

Design

8	--
Height
6.36 inches (161.56 mm)	6.47 inches (164.4 mm)
Width
2.91 inches (73.82 mm)	3.07 inches (77.9 mm)
Thickness
0.35 inches (8.89 mm)	0.31 inches (7.9 mm)
Weight
192 grams	192 grams
Colors
Mint Green, Pearl Blue, Ice Lilac	Vibing Blue, Glam Green, Bling Black
Water Resistant
Yes, Splash proof, IP52	NA

Display

7.5	--
Resolution
1080 x 2400 pixels	1080 x 2340 pixels
Aspect Ratio
20:9	19.5:9
Display Type
IPS LCD	Super AMOLED
Size
6.5 inches (16.51 cms)	6.7 inches (17.02 cms)
Pixel Density
405 pixels per inch (ppi)	385 pixels per inch (ppi)
Color Reproduction
16M Colors	16M Colors
Display Refresh Rate
120Hz	90Hz

Camera

7.5	--
Rear camera setup
Dual	Triple
Rear camera (Primary)
50 MP resolutionWide Angle lensf/1.8 aperture1.22µm pixel size	50 MP resolutionWide Angle lensf/1.8 aperture2.76" sensor size0.64µm pixel size
Rear camera (Secondary)
8 MP resolutionUltra-Wide Angle lensf/2.2 aperture1.12µm pixel size	5 MP resolutionUltra-Wide Angle lensf/2.2 aperture5.0" sensor size1.12µm pixel size
Rear camera (Tertiary)
NA	2 MP resolutionMacro lensf/2.4 aperture
Front camera setup
Single	Single
Front camera (Primary)
16 MP resolutionWide Angle lensf/2.4 aperture1µm pixel size	13 MP resolutionWide Angle lensf/2.0 aperture3.1" sensor size1.12µm pixel size
Sensor
ISO-CELL	NA
Flash
LED Rear flash	LED Rear flash
Video Resolution (Rear)
1920x1080 @ 30 fps	1920x1080 @ 30 fps1280x720 @ 120 fps
Video Resolution (Front)
1920x1080 @ 30 fps	1920x1080 @ 30 fps
Optical Image Stabilization(OIS)
Yes	NA
Camera Features
Auto Flash Auto Focus Face detection Touch to focus	Auto Focus Face detection Touch to focus
Shooting Modes
Continuous Shooting High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) Burst mode Macro Mode	Continuous Shooting High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) Macro Mode

Battery

9.5	--
Capacity
6000 mAh	5000 mAh
Battery Type
Li-Polymer	Li-ion
Quick Charging
Yes, 33W Turbo Charging, 50% in 33 minutes	Yes, 25W Fast Charging
Wireless Charging
No	No
Wireless Reverse Charging
No	No

Software

8.5	--
Operating System
Android v14	Android v14
Custom UI
MY UX	No

Storage

Internal Storage
128 GB	128 GB
Storage Type
UFS 2.2	NA
Expandable Storage
Yes, microSD, Up to 1 TB (Hybrid Slot)	Yes, microSD, Up to 1.5 TB (Hybrid Slot)

Connectivity

SIM Configuration
Dual SIM SIM1: Nano SIM2: Hybrid	Dual SIM SIM1: Nano SIM2: Hybrid
Network
SIM1: 5G, 4GSIM2: 5G, 4G	SIM1: 5G, 4GSIM2: 5G, 4G
Voice over LTE(VoLTE)
Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi
Yes, with a/ac/b/g/n/n 5GHz, MIMO	Yes, with a/ac/b/g/n/n 5GHz
Wi-fi features
Mobile Hotspot	Mobile Hotspot
Bluetooth
Bluetooth v5.3	Bluetooth v5.3
USB
USB 2.0, USB Type-C, Mass storage device, USB charging, USB On-The-Go	USB 2.0, USB Type-C, Mass storage device, USB charging, USB On-The-Go
USB OTG Support
Yes	Yes
GPS
Yes with A-GPS, Glonass	Yes with A-GPS, Glonass
NFC
No	Yes

Sound

8	--
Speaker
Yes	Yes
Speaker Features
Dolby Atmos	NA
Audio Jack
Yes, 3.5mm	Yes, USB Type-C
Video Player
Yes, Video Formats: MP4	Yes, Video Formats: 3G2, 3GP, AVI, M4V, MKV, MP4, WebM

Sensors

Fingerprint Sensor
Yes	Yes
Fingerprint Sensor Position
Side	Side
Other Sensor
Light sensorProximity sensorAccelerometerCompassGyroscope	Light sensorProximity sensorAccelerometerGyroscope

Antutu Benchmark Scores

Overall
497,235	--
CPU
161,440	--
GPU
78,966	--
Memory
116,384	--
UX
140,445	--

Geekbench Benchmark Scores

Single-core
1,015	--
Multi-core
2,469	--
Moto G64 Benchmarks	--

By Prices

By Brand

By Feature

By Price

By Brand

By Feature

By Price

By Features

By Brand

By Screen Sizes

Moto G64 vs Samsung Galaxy F16 5G

Overall

CPU

GPU

Memory

UX

Single-core

Multi-core

Popular Comparisons