Are you looking to buy a smartphone in the sub-Rs 30,000 price segment? The recent Motorola Edge 50 Neo and the Vivo V40e are the latest contenders in the price range. Although both are priced almost similarly, they still cater to different audiences. In this article, we’ve done the hard work for you to help you decide which smartphone fits your needs best.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo vs Vivo V40e: Specifications at Glance
4.4 ★
|
4.4 ★
| |
₹ 22,289
|
₹ 25,835
| |
Expert Score | 8.2/10 by Expert | 8.1/10 by Expert |
Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 |
Display | 6.4″ (16.26 cm) 120Hz Display | 6.77″ (17.2 cm) 120Hz Display |
Rear Camera | 50+13+10 MP Rear | 50+8 MP Rear |
Front Camera | 32 MP Front | 50 MP Front |
RAM & Storage | 8 GB RAM 256 GB Storage | 8 GB RAM 128 GB Storage |
Battery | 4310 mAh 68W Charging | 5500 mAh 80W Charging |
OS | Android v14 | Android v14 |
Motorola Edge 50 Neo vs Vivo V40e: Price Comparison
Smartphone | Configuration | Price | Availability |
Motorola Edge 50 Neo | 8GB+256GB | Rs 26,999 | Motorola eStore and Flipkart |
Vivo V40e | 8GB+128GB | Rs 28,999 | Vivo eStore and Flipkart |
8GB+256GB | Rs 30,999 |
As you can see from the table, both phones offer 8GB of RAM and 256GB of storage. But, the Vivo V40e throws in a 128GB option too. So, if cost, RAM, and storage are important to you, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo is the more affordable choice.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo vs Vivo V40e: Design
Smartphone | Motorola Edge 50 Neo | Vivo V40e |
Thickness | 8.1mm | 7.49mm |
Weight | 171 grams | 183 grams |
Colours | Poinciana, Latte, Grisaille, Nautical Blue | Mint Green, Royal Bronze |
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo is your compact sidekick, rocking a premium vegan leather finish. It’s 12 grams lighter than the Vivo V40e but somehow feels even lighter in hand. It comes in four colour options and we got our hands on the PANTONE Latte, which is cute, compact, and well-built.
Meanwhile, the Vivo V40e is very sleek. The glossy back panel looks stunning, and the Royal Bronze colour has an uncanny resemblance to the iPhone 16 Pro’s Desert Titanium. Additionally, the camera setup is quite similar to that of the Vivo T3 Ultra and the V40 Pro.
Both phones are undeniably attractive, but it comes down to what you value more. If you want something compact and practical, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo is a great fit. If you prefer a taller and more elegant design, the Vivo V40e, with its extra flair and weight, is the one to strut with.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo vs Vivo V40e: Display
Smartphone | Motorola Edge 50 Neo | Vivo V40e |
Display Size | 6.4-inch pOLED | 6.77-inch AMOLED |
Resolution | 1220 x 2712 pixels | 1080 x 2392 pixels |
Refresh Rate | 120Hz | 120Hz |
Peak Brightness | 2800 nits | NA |
Display Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | NA |
The Vivo V40e sports a larger display than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo, with a touch of curve thrown in. But those curved edges can lead to accidental touches, which sometimes become a frustrating issue. That said, the display impresses with its colour accuracy and crisp video playback. With HDR10 and Widevine L1, it delivers a pretty immersive experience.
Meanwhile, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo keeps things simple with a vibrant, flat display. There’s no HDR but the 120Hz refresh rate makes everything smooth. Plus, the balanced bezels ensure you get the most out of its smaller screen without distractions.
When it comes to brightness, Vivo didn’t claim official numbers for the V40e. In our tests, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo hit 1979 nits, while the Vivo V40e maxed out at 1642 nits—not a huge difference, but the Edge 50 Neo holds up better in bright sunlight.
If display quality is a priority, the Vivo V40e with its HDR10 support might be your go-to.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo vs Vivo V40e: Performance
Smartphone | Motorola Edge 50 Neo | Vivo V40e |
Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 |
Graphics | Mali-G615 MC2 | Mali-G615 MC2 |
RAM | 8GB | 8GB |
Storage | 256GB | 256GB |
Manufacturing Process | 4nm | 4nm |
Both phones run on the same chipset, so you’d expect them to perform identically on paper. However, our AnTuTu v10 benchmark revealed some subtle score differences. Here’s a look at the difference in scores:
With the Motorola Edge 50 Neo, we experienced smooth sailing with no lags or stutters during everyday tasks, making it a reliable choice for daily use.
In contrast, the Vivo V40e stumbled through casual tasks with noticeable lags and stutters, even after the software update. It’s safe to say it could use a bit more polish.
When it comes to gaming, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo hit a peak of 60 fps in Call of Duty: Mobile, with occasional dips down to 55 fps. The overall performance wasn’t stellar; with ups, downs, and some frustrating moments that might annoy avid gamers.
On the flip side, the Vivo V40e also hit 60 fps in Call of Duty: Mobile but the minimum dropped to 57 fps. The numbers aren’t terrible, but the gaming experience felt just…okay. Plus, the phone got noticeably warm after a couple of rounds.
Taking all of this into account, if you need a phone primarily for everyday tasks, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo is a solid pick. However, for gaming enthusiasts, both devices leave something to be desired. You might want to explore options like the iQOO Z9s or the Realme 13+ for a better gaming experience.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo vs Vivo V40e: Software
Smartphone | Motorola Edge 50 Neo | Vivo V40e |
Software | Android 14 | FunTouchOS 14, based on Android 14 |
OS Updates | 5 years of OS updates | 3 years of OS updates |
Security Updates | 5 years of security updates | 4 years of security updates |
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo delivers a seamless, polished, and user-friendly software experience. The only bloatware we found was Facebook. It boasts features like an Always-On Display, fingerprint animations, app security, and vibrant lock screen wallpapers.
On the other hand, the Vivo V40e is a bit of a bloatware magnet, packed with pre-installed apps that many users might find frustrating. Fortunately, there are no spam notifications. This phone includes a split screen, face beauty for videos, and Dynamic Light, among others.
In terms of software, both devices offer plenty of customisable features. However, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo stands out with its cleaner interface compared to the Vivo V40e. Plus, if you like to hang onto your phone for a while, Motorola’s promise of five years of software support is a major bonus.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo vs Vivo V40e: Cameras
Smartphone | Motorola Edge 50 Neo | Vivo V40e |
Primary Camera | 50MP rear with OIS
f/1.7 aperture |
50MP with OIS
Sony IMX882, f/1.79 aperture |
Secondary Camera | 13MP ultra-wide, f/2.2 aperture | 8MP wide-angle, f/2.2 aperture |
Tertiary Camera | 10MP telephoto, f/2.0 aperture | NA |
Selfie Camera | 32MP autofocus selfie, f/2.4 aperture | 50MP JN1 AF selfie, f/2.0 aperture |
As highlighted in the table above, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo sports a triple camera setup, while the Vivo V40e opts for a dual-camera configuration.
When it comes to daylight photography, the Edge 50 Neo excels, delivering bright images with impressive dynamic range and sharp details. Its ultra-wide camera also performs admirably, with pleasantly surprising edge clarity.
In 2x mode, the photos are crisp, but the story changes in 3x mode. Here, the colours become overly vibrant, resulting in a somewhat over-processed and artificial look. In low-light conditions, the Edge 50 Neo maintains consistent details, lighting, and colours, although there is an issue with lens flare. Sometimes, though, the flare can add an artistic touch, so we’re willing to overlook it.
On the flip side, the Vivo V40e captures vibrant daylight shots but some grain is noticeable. The aggressive image enhancement can sometimes throw the colours off balance.
Its ultra-wide camera provides a wider field of view while thankfully avoiding distortion. As for low-light performance, the Vivo V40e offers sharper images, but it still falls short compared to what the Motorola Edge 50 Neo brings to the table.
So, if the camera is a top priority, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo undoubtedly takes the crown.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo vs Vivo V40e: Battery and Charging
Smartphone | Motorola Edge 50 Neo | Vivo V40e |
Battery | 4,310mAh | 5,500mAh |
Charging Speed | 68W | 80W |
Charging Time | 45 minutes | 1 hour 3 minutes |
PCMark Battery Test | Error occurred twice | 18 hours, 22 minutes |
The Vivo V40e features a battery capacity that’s 1,190mAh greater than that of the Motorola Edge 50 Neo. Plus, it supports a slightly faster charging speed. However, with its sizable battery, it still takes over an hour to reach a full charge.
In the PCMark Battery test, the Vivo V40e clocked an impressive 18 hours and 22 minutes of use.
Conversely, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo charges in just 45 minutes. While that’s quick, it does have a smaller battery to power. Unfortunately, we don’t have PCMark test results since it failed during our testing twice. That said, with light to moderate use, it can last nearly a full day.
So, if you’re after a phone that can keep going for more than a day, the Vivo V40e is the way to go.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo vs Vivo V40e: Verdict
So, here’s the deal; the Motorola Edge 50 Neo if you’re in the market for a compact smartphone that delivers a solid display, a streamlined software experience, reliable everyday performance, and exceptional camera quality.
In contrast, the Vivo V40e boasts a stylish design with an HDR display and decent customisation options. The cameras perform reasonably well too. So, you can go for it if this is your need. However, be prepared to deal with some pre-installed bloatware apps, which might be a drawback for some users.