vivo T4 vs realme Narzo 80 Pro

x vivo T4 ₹19,999 Flipkart	x realme Narzo 80 Pro ₹18,473 Flipkart
Overview Price Photos Specs Reviews Competitors Pros & Cons User Ratings Benchmarks News Related Reviews

Add More Products

4.5 ★

vivo T4

₹19,999

Flipkart

4.4 ★

realme Narzo 80 Pro

₹18,473

Flipkart

Overview Show Only Differences

Expert Score
8.1/10By Expert	--
Processor
Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 Octa core	MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Octa core
RAM & Storage
8 GB RAM 128 GB Storage	8 GB RAM 128 GB Storage
Camera
50+2 MP Rear 32 MP Front	50+2 MP Rear 16 MP Front
Display
6.77″ (17.2 cm) 120Hz AMOLED	6.7″ (17.02 cm) 120Hz OLED
Battery
7300 mAh \| 90W Fast Charging	6000 mAh \| 80W Fast Charging
Price
₹ 19,999 Flipkart	₹ 18,473 Flipkart
₹ 21,388 Amazon	₹ 19,998 Amazon

Compare in 360 View

Photos and Videos

PHOTOS

VIDEO

PHOTOS

Pros & Cons

PROS

Vibrant display with clear picture qualityProlonged battery lifeDependable portrait snapperSurprisingly lightweight phoneAdequate performance without lag or stutter

We are yet to review this device

CONS

BloatwareMono speaker lacks depth in audio qualityLow-light camera performance needs tweaking

We are yet to review this device

Reviews

8.1/10 by Shubh Bhushan | 06 May 2025

The Vivo T4 5G stands out with its excellent battery life, solid display, and dependable performance for casual use. Its portrait camera shines, though low-light shots need work. While the software is stable and updated regularly, spammy notifications and limited long-term support may be off-putting. The mono speaker also underwhelms. Consider the iQOO Z10 for similar proposition yet speedier performance, the Nothing Phone (3a) for a cleaner UI, or the Motorola Edge 60 Fusion for a more balanced experience.

Read Full Review

We are yet to review this device

Users Ratings

4.5/5 Based on 17.7K Ratings

73% (12.8K)

16% (2,888)

4% (752)

2% (371)

5% (819)

4.4/5 Based on 405 Ratings

65% (264)

21% (87)

4% (18)

1% (5)

8% (31)

Performance

8.5	--
Chipset
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3	MediaTek Dimensity 7400
No Of Cores
8 (Octa Core)	8 (Octa Core)
CPU
2.5GHz, Single core, Cortex A720 2.4GHz, Tri core, Cortex A720 1.8GHz, Quad core, Cortex A520	2.6GHz, Quad core, Cortex A78 2GHz, Quad core, Cortex A55
Architecture
64-bit	64-bit
Fabrication
4 nm	4 nm
RAM
8 GB	8 GB
RAM Type
LPDDR4X	LPDDR4X
Graphics (GPU)
Adreno 810	Mali-G615 MC2

Add More Products

vivo T4 & realme Narzo 80 Pro Competitors

vivo V50

₹ 34,999

Available

Compare

vivo V50e

₹ 28,999

Available

Compare

Samsung Galaxy A35 5G

₹ 19,999

Available

Compare

realme P3

₹ 15,980

Available

Compare

vivo T3 Ultra

₹ 27,999

Available

Compare

realme 14 Pro

₹ 22,775

Available

Compare

iQOO Z9s

₹ 18,548

Available

Compare

realme P3 Pro

₹ 19,999

Available

Compare

OnePlus Nord CE 4 5G

₹ 21,997

Available

Compare

iQOO Z10

₹ 20,940

Available

Compare

vivo T3 Pro

₹ 22,999

Available

Compare

OPPO K13

₹ 17,470

Available

Compare

realme Narzo 70 Turbo

₹ 13,249

Available

Compare

Motorola Edge 60 Fusion

₹ 22,449

Available

Compare

vivo T4X

₹ 13,999

Available

Compare

View All

Related News

Vivo T4 Review: Much More than Just a Beefy Battery

Shubh Bhushan - 06 May, 2025

Realme Launches NARZO 80 Pro 5G in Nitro Orange Colour in India: Check Details

Basith Rahman P P - 01 May, 2025

Related Reviews

iQOO Z10 Review: A Zealous Powerhouse

Shimul Sood - 03 May, 2025

Vivo V50e Review: Trust Over Thrills

Darab Mansoor Ali - 16 Apr, 2025

Motorola Edge 60 Fusion Review: A No-Nonsense, Well-Rounded Experience

Shubh Bhushan - 10 Apr, 2025

Realme P3 5G Review: Affordable Beast in a Silver Armour

Shubh Bhushan - 26 Mar, 2025

Vivo T4X Review: A Strong Contender Under ?15,000, but There’s a Catch

Shubh Bhushan - 05 Mar, 2025

Vivo V50 Review: The Sequel That Exceeds Expectations

Shimul Sood - 18 Feb, 2025

Realme P3 Pro Review: When an All-Rounder Gets a Gen-Z Treatment

Shubh Bhushan - 18 Feb, 2025

Realme 14 Pro Review: Is it 'Pro' Worthy?

Shimul Sood - 17 Jan, 2025

Vivo T3 Ultra Review: A Bet on Performance Over Pixels

Shubh Bhushan - 20 Sep, 2024

iQOO Z9s Review: Got All the Ingredients in Right Quantities

Shubh Bhushan - 07 Sep, 2024

Vivo T3 Pro Review: T3riffic battery, Pro Performance

Shubh Bhushan - 02 Sep, 2024

Samsung Galaxy A35 Review: Brings Flagship-Grade Experience in the Upper Mid-Range

Nitansh Rastogi - 23 Apr, 2024

View All

Design

8.5	--
Height
6.43 inches (163.4 mm)	6.41 inches (162.75 mm)
Width
3.01 inches (76.4 mm)	2.95 inches (74.92 mm)
Thickness
0.31 inches (7.89 mm)	0.3 inches (7.55 mm)
Weight
199 grams	179 grams
Colors
Emerald Blaze, Phantom Grey	Speed Silver, Racing Green
Water Resistant
Yes, Splash proof, IP65	Yes, Water resistant, IP66, IP68, IP69

Display

8.5	--
Resolution
1080 x 2392 pixels	1080 x 2392 pixels
Aspect Ratio
20:9	NA
Display Type
AMOLED, Always-On display, Blue light filter, Curved Display, Quad Curve, Wet Hand Touch	OLED, Curved Display, Wet Hand Touch
Size
6.77 inches (17.2 cms)	6.7 inches (17.02 cms)
Pixel Density
388 pixels per inch (ppi)	392 pixels per inch (ppi)
Color Reproduction
16M Colors	1B Colors
Display Refresh Rate
120Hz	120Hz

Camera

7.5	--
Rear camera setup
Dual	Dual
Rear camera (Primary)
50 MP resolutionWide Angle lensf/1.8 aperture1.95" sensor size0.8µm pixel size	50 MP resolutionWide Angle (79° FoV) lensf/1.8 aperture26 mm focal length 1.95" sensor size0.8µm pixel size
Rear camera (Secondary)
2 MP resolutionDepth lensf/2.4 aperture	2 MP resolution Mono lensf/2.4 aperture22 mm focal length
Front camera setup
Single	Single
Front camera (Primary)
32 MP resolutionWide Angle lensf/2.0 aperture	16 MP resolutionWide Angle (85° FoV) lensf/2.4 aperture
Sensor
CMOS image sensor, Exmor-RS CMOS Sensor	Exmor-RS CMOS Sensor
Flash
LED Rear flash	LED Rear flash
Video Resolution (Rear)
3840x2160 @ 30 fps1920x1080 @ 30 fps	3840x2160 @ 30 fps1920x1080 @ 120 fps1280x720 @ 240 fps
Video Resolution (Front)
3840x2160 @ 30 fps1920x1080 @ 30 fps	1920x1080 @ 30 fps1280x720 @ 30 fps
Optical Image Stabilization(OIS)
Yes	Yes
Electric Image Stabilization (EIS)
NA	Yes
Camera Features
Auto Flash Auto Focus Face detection Touch to focus	Auto Flash Auto Focus Face detection Touch to focus
Shooting Modes
Continuous Shooting High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) SuperMoon	Continuous Shooting High Dynamic Range mode (HDR)

Battery

9	--
Capacity
7300 mAh	6000 mAh
Battery Type
Li-ion	Silicon Carbon
Quick Charging
Yes, 90W Flash Charging, 50% in 33 minutes	Yes, 80W Super VOOC Charging, 50% in 21 minutes
Wireless Charging
No	No
Wireless Reverse Charging
No	No

Software

7.5	--
Operating System
Android v15	Android v15
Custom UI
Funtouch OS	Realme UI

Storage

Internal Storage
128 GB	128 GB
Storage Type
UFS 2.2	UFS 3.1
External Storage
No	No

Connectivity

SIM Configuration
Dual SIM SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano	Dual SIM SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
Network
SIM1: 5G, 4GSIM2: 5G, 4G	SIM1: 5G, 4GSIM2: 5G, 4G
Voice over LTE(VoLTE)
Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi
Yes, with a/ac/ax/b/g/n/n 5GHz	Yes, with a/ac/b/g/n/n 5GHz
Wi-fi features
Mobile Hotspot	Mobile Hotspot
Bluetooth
Bluetooth v5.2	Bluetooth v5.4
USB
USB 2.0, USB Type-C, Mass storage device, USB charging, USB On-The-Go	USB 2.0, USB Type-C, Mass storage device, USB charging, USB On-The-Go
USB OTG Support
Yes	Yes
GPS
Yes with A-GPS, Glonass	Yes with A-GPS, Glonass
NFC
No	No

Sound

6	--
Speaker
Yes	Yes
Audio Jack
Yes, USB Type-C	Yes, USB Type-C
Video Player
Yes, Video Formats: 3GP, ASF, AVI, MKV, MP4, WebM	Yes, Video Formats: MP4

Sensors

Fingerprint Sensor
Yes	Yes
Fingerprint Sensor Position
On-screen	On-screen
Fingerprint Sensor Type
Optical	Optical
Other Sensor
Light sensorProximity sensorAccelerometerCompassGyroscope	Light sensorAccelerometerCompassGyroscope

Antutu Benchmark Scores

Overall
794,279	711,323
CPU
273,899	216,902
GPU
204,503	175,580
Memory
131,073	142,763
UX
184,804	176,078

Geekbench Benchmark Scores

Single-core
1,164	1,045
Multi-core
3,278	2,928
vivo T4 Benchmarks	realme Narzo 80 Pro Benchmarks

By Prices

By Brand

By Feature

By Price

By Brand

By Feature

By Price

By Features

By Brand

By Screen Sizes

vivo T4 vs realme Narzo 80 Pro

Overall

CPU

GPU

Memory

UX

Single-core

Multi-core

Popular Comparisons